“Chapel Perilous, that vortex where cosmological speculations, coincidences, and paranoia seem to multiply and then collapse, compelling belief or lunacy, wisdom or agnosticism.” ~Robert Anton Wilson

    Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Share

    Lucid Memes
    Red Belt
    Red Belt

    Number of posts: 1111
    Registration date: 2009-02-12
    Location: Here Be Dragons

    Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Lucid Memes on Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:46 am

    So, after realizing the Desdemona is probably 95% of Kealey's own imagination (I posted the reason why I believe this in the last post of this thread [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]), I decided to see if I could find other legit sources as to where Kealey got his ideas from. I remember asking Kealey at one point, what was the eureka moment as to when he figured out the Neanderthals were behind it all...and he didn't give me an exact, clear answer. He went on a long convoluted talked about hair and DNA and was not specific at all. Instead he says he gets this type of information from his own linguistic and genetic code...which is conveniently unattainable to anyone except Kealey himself. So, in my attempt to find out his sources (if any), I did various searches on the subject of Neanderthals and I found very interesting things.

    Now folks, we're about to enter into the realm of fringe anthropology. I'm not endorsing these author's books or theories in any way. If I link to their books or websites, it's only because I'm showing you that they exists and are the likely candidates as to where Kealey got his theories about Neanderthal influence in the modern world.




    Stan Gooch

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    an interesting psychologist and anthropologist who advocates the idea of Neanderthal hybridization of the human species. Essentially, he believes humanity is comprised of a combination of 2 different hominids. Neanderthal and Cromagnon, and that these two different species were almost exact opposites by nature. One side characterizing the qualities of the feminine psyche, the other the masculine...but humanity, being a combination of this masculine Cromagnon and feminine Neanderthal adds reason to suggest where Kealey might have further developed the idea of androgynous origins of mankind.

    Spoiler:
    Here's Stan Gooch's chart on the Neanderthal "System B" and Cromagnon "System A"

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    And since the dawn of humanity, these dualistic aspects have been at war psychologically and genetically, producing mankind's schizoid like behavior. So...ideas and theories about hybridized human races and masculilne/feminine polarities (androgyny) mixed together with Neanderthals, sound familiar right? (note: Gooch has been advocating these theories since the early 70's...Kealey says he woke up to the system in 1998) There's more.



    The "Piggy in the Neck"

    Gooch's dualistic concept of the human psyche is also rooted in the brain. But Gooch rejects the idea of left/right brain hemispheres, but endorses a frontal-lobe/cerebellum conflict for the neurological root of the duality in man.

    frontal cortex thinking = Cromagnon part of the brain
    rear cerebellum thinking = Neanderthal part of the brain

    So...just compare this to Glen Kealey's concept of the "Piggy in the neck"...the idea being that the Neanderthal part of the brain is the medulla oblongata

    Gooch's Neanderthal control center ---> [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    and Kealey's Neanderthal control center ---> [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    nearly the same spot! in fact, they touch each other...coincidence? Sorry, but it's just so obvious where Kealey got these ideas from



    Neanderthal Communism & Lack of Self Esteem

    But go back to the chart and notice the political aspects of the duality and the Neanderthal representation of communism. To further the point in connection to these ideas, Kealey pointed out to me that the name Marx represents the future of the system (i.e. the Neanderthal system) and is a communist system.

    In his book The Neanderthal Legacy: Reawakening Our Genetic and Cultural Origins, Gooch says:

    "One of the many outcomes of this situation, as we cannot stress too often, is the emergence and ever-growing dominance of the left-wing political movement, of left-wing thinking. Communism and socialism are...the Neanderthals' view of the universe." Page 135.

    "The left-wing, with it's more "feminine" (nuturing) ideals of compassion and equality, really does belong to the feminine (left-hand) polarity." link

    So, Gooch believes that Neanderthal communism is a reaction to their inferiority complex...Kealey mentions that the reason why the Neanderthals have created the system to enslave us is because they felt inferior to the other humans around them.

    Collin Wilson is a prolific writer who has written a few books about Neanderthals and was largely influenced by Stan Gooch...here's an essay written by Colin Wilson in praise of Gooch [link]. There's a cleverly titled article about Wilson's research into crime called "Marxist de Sade" Where the author postulates his theory that the origin crime, rape, and murder are rooted in a criminal's lack of self-esteem. [link]...this would fit into the idea that Neanderthals are waging a war against mankind due to an inferiority complex

    This is silly, but important to Kealey's grand solution. That is, making theses supposed Neanderthals feel good about themselves, thus befriending them. Anyway, moving on



    Neanderthal Pedophile Priesthood & Religions

    This, then of course leads me to another one of Stan Gooch's concept of pedophile priests of the Neanderthal system B

    Gooch says:
    "Both as a professional psychologist and a freelance lecturer I have visited institutions which house closed arders of nuns and priests respectively. I have even stayed in the latter. These orders have, of course, entirely given up sex as an aspect of their lives - or so they say. ...I have been struck in the institutions mentioned by the generally boyish behavior and attitudes of the men, and the girlish behaviour of the women. On the basis of such obeservation, I would think that many of these people are cases uf unfulfilled or arested sexual development. In that general emotional area, they are not so much asexual as pre-pubertal."

    "Well, no doubt, that comment has offended some religious readers of this book, but I am afraid my next suggestion will offend them still further. I am going to suggest that the priesthood has always been a refuge for types of homosexual and lesbian, as also for other kinds of sexual 'devieance' - i.e. sexual, pre-sexual or asexual behaviours whose goal is not the production of children. I am going to go even as far as to suggest that the homosexual/lesbian and androgynous human being has made a significant contribution to the evolution of religion."
    [link]

    And on the subject of this stream of behavior flowing through religions, check out the review for the subject matter of this book

    "While their physical descendants may be almost extinct, the influence of Neanderthal occult wisdom remains strong and can be found throughout history among witches, kabbalists, the Knights Templar, Rosicrucians, and even in Christianity and Judaism." [link]



    The Thirteen & The Holy Grail

    Another thing that Gooch talks about excessively (that reminds me of Kealey) is the feminine connection between the number 13 and the Holy Grail, etc...

    "The 13 comes from Moon worships as there are 13 sidereal lunations of 28 days giving 364 for a year..and thus the year and a day fairy tales...early christian/church elders needed to get people away from the adoration of the moon and its 13 lunations thus they demonized it with "unlucky 13"..why on earth would lower mammals come into estreus only seasonly where man would sync up with up the new moons...Jesus and his 12 disciples, Arthur and his 12 knights...its all here.. " [link]

    Kealey is looking for 12 people to make a group of 13 (12 around 1) to get Enoch's tablets...sounds like King Arthur or Jesus Christ, eh? For me this is a red flag when he talks about google being responsible for his crucifixion.

    Now...there's so much to say about this, but believe it or not, I'm trying to be brief lol

    Again, I'll show you Kealey concepts that are older than Kealey's ideas, but related to fringe neanderthal anthropological theories. Check out this guy (and note, I don't subscribe to these beliefs, I just found out what they are)

    Michael Bradley

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    Michael Bradley is another author who writes theories about Neanderthal influence in the modern world. So he's similar to Stan Gooch in some sense, but is almost totally opposite in regards to the disposition of the Neanderthals. Gooch believed the neanderthals were peaceful, matriarchal, creative and nice fun loving people...where as Bradley believes they were warlike, patriarchal, and overly aggressive and destructive. In fact, the origins of evil are rooted in the neanderthal man's genetic structure (according to Bradley).

    Spoiler:
    Bradley wrote the book "Iceman Inheritance: Prehistoric Sources of Western Man's Racism, Sexism and Aggression" detailing the history of the Caucasian man's "evil dominance" over the world as being attributed to a Cromagnon/Neanderthal hybridization in the caucus mountain region during pre-history times. In that book, he blames white people for their savagery, but ultimately sees them as victims of a genetic burden heaped upon them by warlike invaders from the Caucus mountains. He quotes the work of Marija Gimbutas and her theories of "Old Europe." What she means by old-europe, is the matriarchal people and culture that existed before the Indo-European invaders...conquerers who brought with them, warfare, patriarchy and a territorial obsession that led to world domination. But even that said, Bradley doesn't even think that white people are the most "neanderthal-like" people in the world. "Only modern Caucasians, who descended partly from Neanderthals, exhibit Neanderthal physical traits in vestigial form -- and even most Caucasians do not reflect the extreme glacial adaptation of pure Neanderthals. Only Caucasians from the Caucasus region, who are more directly descended from Neanderthals, still exhibit these characteristics strongly."[link] So to him, Europeans have a smaller percentage of Neanderthal DNA, where as the Jews have the most concentrated amount of Neanderthal traits of all the Caucasian ethnic groups...he wrote another book called "Chosen People from the Caucasus: Jewish Origins, Delusions, Deceptions and Historical Role in the Slave Trade, Genocide and Cultural Colonization" filling out in theories. So all together, there were 3 major waves of Caucus Human/Neanderthal hybrids that conquered the current order of the time. 1) the Aryan invasions 2) the Hyksos and 3) the Khazars. But he tends to focus more on the latter two.

    So what does this have to do with Kealey? ...basically, a lot

    What I've noticed with Kealey, he'll pick bits and pieces of theories from various authors and fits them into a concept that seems to be uniquely Kealey's, but really is not. Here are some examples:



    The Power Balance Between East and West Controlled By Central Asian Natsi (istans)

    One of my favorite theories from Kealey was the idea that the Western world and Eastern world are controlled by people in Central Asia, who have the power to stifle one hemisphere, while granting technological and economic power to the other. He attributes the European Dark Ages to this this process and goes onto say that the West was brought back to power when these controllers brought economic resources and technology to Europe, that kicked off the Renaissance. Well, Look at what Michael Bradley says that is similar to this. Bradley traces the source of this power to the Huns and Khazars of central asia, who are according to him, descendants of Neanderthals.

    "Therefore, as far as the history of the world is concerned, we are faced with a significant and terrifying genetic fact. Just one group of very aggressive Caucasussteppe barbarians has played an inordinately large role in moulding the general pattern of world history. The Huns attacked China in the third century BC, but they were thwarted by the Ch’in Dynasty’s Great Wall. However, in memory of the “hairy barbarians”, Chinese civilization remained psychologically inhibited and relatively (relative to the West, that is) non-expansive territorially. Then these same Huns returned to their Caucasus-steppes, terrorized their neighbours and brought about the Fall of Rome. They brought about the European “Dark Ages” following the barbarian invasions. Then, pushing the Vandals to over-run the Middle East, they inspired the religion of Islam. This resulted in the Moslem “jihad” that conquered the Middle East from the Mediterranean to India and also conquered East Africa and North Africa. In a new guise, as “Khazars”, they were to mould the modern Western World’s technological, financial, military and cultural geopolitical expansion…as we will see." - Genetics in Western History and Religion, Bradley



    The Jews: The Eastern Europeans

    Another thing that Kealey talks about are the "Eastern Europeans" that came to America during the 1880's (bringing with them the supposed Desdamona Code). These "Eastern Europeans" took over American finance, banking, academia, and the media...It's obvious to me that these Eastern Europeans are Jews, but he's just using "Eastern Europeans" as a euphemism. Bradley says that the descendants of the Khazars got pushed into Eastern Europe and became modern Jewry.

    "The descendants of these Khazars are today’s so-called "Ashkenazi Jews". They now represent the vast majority of modern "Jewry" (95%), although they have no direct genetic or historical relationship at all with biblical Israelites. These "Ashkenazim" were the prime victims of Hitler's so-called "Holocaust" and are the so-called "Jews" of Central and Eastern Europe and particularly of the United States to which they emigrated in great numbers about 1870. And, of course, they also constitute the vast majority of modern Israel's population." - Ibid

    To Bradley, the ultimate Jew is a Neanderthal...and that's right a long the lines of what Kealey says, but in a strange way. That people who call themselves "Jewish" are ones who wish they were Judeans...and the Judeans are the Deans, deans of dollars or Neanderthallers.



    Media Masters Causing Middle Eastern Confusion

    And these people that took over the media, are responsible for all the chaos and confusion that's going on in the Middle East. And speaking of the Middle East, according to Bradley, "From an anthropological perspective, the chronic crisis in the Middle East is not primarily of a "religious" nature. It is primarily a genetic struggle for world dominance between two strains of people who retain significant Neanderthal characteristics, Arabs and Jews." [...] "We see this process already starting in current newspaper headlines. There is mounting opposition to the “War Against Iraq” momentum that has been promoted by that “certain” group within American industry and media, especially CNN, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. This international opposition has begun to isolate the United States and Israel from the world community. And it is only a matter of time. before there will be yet another so-called and highly inaccurately termed “Anti-Semitic” backlash in the West. So, the genetic profile of today's Middle Eastern confrontation actually involves mainly the descendants of some Caucasus-steppe barbarians (“Jews”) initiating financial, military, territorial and cultural aggression against descendants of yet other Caucasussteppe barbarians (Islamic Arabs). No wonder the conflict is so merciless." - Ibid

    See, the major difference here between Kealey and Bradley, is that Kealey sees genetic problems as occurring because of Neanderthal genetic engineering...where as Bradley sees as the unconscious result of hybridization with a non-human species. And Bradley literally thinks that Neanderthals are non-human.



    Non Human Origins of Neanderthal & The Black Sea Flood

    And speaking of non-human origins...this would explain the plot hole in Kealey's story. Kealey said that humanity came from androgynous clan mothers, and that this clan mother's species were homohabilis ...well, this made no sense at all because homohabilis is far too old of a hominid to be the forbears of humanity or Neanderthal. But after going through Bradley's work, I realized where he got the idea from. " The National Geographic (September 2002) reported that many skeletal remains of a hominid similar to Homo habilis had rather surprisingly been discovered in the Caucasus Mountains of the former Soviet Republic of Georgia. Homo habilis was previously known only from East Africa and dated to about 1-3 million years ago. Some features of these bones, notably the lower jaws, seem to me quite similar in some characteristics to typical Neanderthal jaws. Neanderthals may (note the emphasis), therefore, have evolved from this early hominid. Homo habilis is thought to have been “human”, all right, but not the branch of Homo that evolved into present and modern humanity." - Ibid.

    Kealey was just repeating Bradley's non-sense that Neanderthals are a defected subspecies of hablis...when the real likely hood is that Humans and Neanderthals probably came from Erectus or Heidelbergensis [link].

    Another strange concept that I've heard Kealey and Watt talk about, was that humans may have evolved from pigs! Which is one of the most unprobably concepts I've heard ever heard in regards to human evolution. But again, while reading Bradley, I see where he may have gotten the idea from. This is where he makes Lord of the Rings analogies to neanderthal/Khazar/jewish genetics and folk etymology.

    "The Eastern realm of Sauron's "Mordor" in J.R.R. Tolkein's The Lord of the Rings was modelled on a mixture of early medieval Hun/Khazars and modern Western industrialism. The soldiers of Mordor were called orcs...which is Gaelic Irish (the Goidelic branch of Celtic) for pigs. The word “Khazar” itself also means “pig” in the Gothic branch of Germanic that influenced Yiddish (i.e. Yid Deutsch or “Jew German”) so much and we will soon learn the significance of this. Tolkein therefore told an allegorical, but nonetheless true, history in his masterpiece. It was the West's ancient and continuing battle against genetic domination by ferocious Caucasus-steppe barbarians." - Ibid

    Ill get back to this LOTRs stuff soon, but this goes to show where Kealey got the idea of the Black Sea flood. Alan Watt, as you all know, took a lot of idea from Kealey, one of which being about the Black Sea flooding. Watt claimed that human experiments were done in the Black Sea region, and something went wrong and humans began to eat each other, so the scientists of the time flooded area. So how Watt connected this to pigs

    Steven: So you didn't want to suggest that humans were made of pigs?

    Alan: No, not at all. Regardless of what they say at the top, always remember they have a meaning behind it. Generally, it's a form of mocking the public themselves. The only thing as I say that apparently from all the knowledge we’re given, even if it's true, is that we are closer to pigs than apes; but they're always playing jokes on us, so who really, really knows? That's what some of the old ancients used to say to. That was supposedly why they didn't want to eat the pigs. That knowledge was known back then for instance. However, if you go into the writings of the Hindu with much older histories and again you've got to take everything with a pinch of salt and don't take anything at face value. There's often allegories behind them. They do talk about a time in the ancient past and they go back millions of years with the histories and mythologies. Most ancient history really takes a form of mythology, and they say that the Black Sea area at one time was a valley and that an elite were experimenting with different kinds of humans and that the experiment went wrong when different kinds of humans began to eat each other and so they flooded that, which became the Black Sea. Interesting enough, a National Geographic Magazine a few years ago shows them going down in the Black Sea with a submarine and they found layers of settlements and old ancient buildings deep below the waters there on both sides of the valley. There was habitation there at one time and so it seems true that it was flooded at one point. Who knows? That's all you have to really go on. The rest is speculation.
    - source

    So overall, Watt and Kealey are probably repeating wild speculation they got from Bradley's idea that Neanderthals evolved from Homohabilis in the Black Sea region. Kealey goes onto speculate that Neanderthals were more aquatic and more like seacows (aquatic mammals) and pig like. They probably created this fictional mythology in hindsight, trying to give a reason for why the bible and koran say not to eat pork (i.e. according to Watt, don't eat other humans).

    Its also Important to note that the reason Bradley believes the first wave of Caucasian barbarians conquered much of Euroasia was because of the Black Sea flood. Starting about "5634 BC" (but I will happily settle for "about 5600 BC") because of this great Black Sea flood, highly Neanderthal Caucasus Mountain and Russian steppe peoples, variously called Marianu, Hittites, Hyksos, Mittani, Hurrians and Hebrews were flooded out of the Black Sea basin. These highly aggressive Neanderthal Caucasus people fled from the flood in all directions. They emerged from their Black Sea and Caucasus Mountain refuge and they came out into the Western World. [link]



    The First Phases of the Northern Hemisphere's Destruction


    This IMO is one of the most blatantly obvious ideas that Kealey took from Bradley. Kealey says that the new Neanderthal system will begin after the Northern Hemisphere of the planet is destroyed in 3 phases.

    Phase 1) Massive tsunami to destroy America. Will probably start in November 11, 2011 (11/11/2011) and will end in 2018, give or take 2 years; but ultimately, everyone will know by 2020

    Phase 3) Rocks falling from the sky, either by deflecting comets into the Earth, or by destroying the moon and having the rocks fall downward. The 3rd and final phase will coincide with the coming of Haley's comet [link]

    So basically...what you have here, is the Neanderthal's new system, coming into being between 2011 and 2018, in the face of a pending celestial impact on earth. Now, I'm gonna quote Michael Bradley from the front page of his own website. Under the section where it says "A Brave New World" Bradley details his series of fictional books called The Marc Rennsalaer Series..."The thirteen novels chronicle the gradual emergence of a new world between 2011 and 2018 starting with today’s energy crisis that is further complicated by an impending celestial disaster called the ‘Goldfarb Event’ (Bone)." [link]. I have not read this series, nor do I really plan to. But the book "Bone" the talks about the "Glodfarb Event" ends like this, "That baleful point of incandescence still marked the location of the ‘event’, as Goldfarb called it. And I thought that I could see – or as it only imagination sparked by a dangerous little bit of knowledge? – straight dim filaments of anaemic light that could be asteroid debris streaking away from the point of impact. [link]

    More on Bradley
    Spoiler:
    Wait...there's more

    Bradley has a trilogy based on the Holy Grail. [link]

    And here on this page of his book, you can see him musing with Mormon ideas [link] (you'll see the significance of this in a moment)

    Bradley a resident of Canada, insists that Celtic-French Grail Knights came to the North American continent, in particular the Ottawa Ontario area of Canada and Upstate New York through the passage of the Saint Lawrence River; much earlier than what is conventionally believed. Here's a link from his site link 1, link 2

    He (Michael Bradley) suspected that the “Grail Refugees” had come into conflict with the Iroquois and that the Grail Refugees had been massacred shortly before A.D. 1600. Bradley also suspected that the Book of Mormon might be based on an actual record of the Grail Refugees’ North American experience. But, if so, there had been two major “daughter settlements” inland from Nova Scotia, one in the Green Mountains on the Vermont-Quebec border and another above the Falls in the Niagara region – according to the Book of Mormon.

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    Here are a couple of books from his Holy Grail Trilogy, along with brief reviews:

    Holy Grail Across the Atlantic: The Secret History of Canadian Discovery and Exploration (Hounslow Press, Toronto, Ontario 1988)
    Was a castle in Nova Scotia the new haven for the "Holy Grail"? Do ruins in a Nova Scotia village conceal a dramatic and romantic chapter of history?

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


    Grail Knights of North America: On the Trail of the Grail (The Dundurn Group, Toronto, Ontario 1998)
    A decade ago, Michael Bradley published the Canadian bestseller, Holy Grail Across the Atlantic (Hounslow Press, 1988), presenting the astounding evidence that a European settlement in Canada had been established in Nova Scotia ninety-four years before Columbus and ninety-nine years before John Cabot. Incredibly, mediaeval documents and maps showed that this settlement had been founded by refugee Knights Templar from Scotland - knights who had been created for the sole purpose of guarding the Holy Grail. Bradley presented evidence that these Grail-believing religious refugees and their knightly protectors had been instrumental in discovering, settling, and influencing the development of New France and, later, the fledgling American Republic. Realizing from mediaeval documents that the initial Nova Scotia refuge of AD 1398 must have harboured many Grail believers, and that the secret colony must have expanded, Bradley began to trace evidence of Grail Knights from Nova Scotia, through New Brunswick to the St. Lawrence River, and on to the Great Lakes as far as Niagara, New York State, and central Pennsylvania. Evidence of their presence has been uncovered on both the Canadian and American sides of this great waterway.

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]



    So what does this have to do with Kealey?

    Basically...the idea that there's a hidden artifact in the Upstate New York/Ontario region...where as Bradley talks about the Holy Grail...Kealey essentially says the same thing with Enoch's tablets! Kealey claims that Enoch's stone tablets is in this New York/Ontario region, but insists it's probably buried somewhere underneath his farm in the same area!

    Now, Kealey says that Enoch's artifact explains everything about genetic engineering, eh? And if you ask Michael Bradley what the Holy Grail really is, he'll say, "The Grail is a bloodline of people, notably rulers or tribal leaders" ...and what's significant about these people, according to Bradley, is that they're genetically pure blooded, not containing any amount of Neanderthal inheritance. Cause you see, this summarizes the entire theme of all his work. It is that evil Neanderthals interbred with humanity and hijacked all our precious civilized art and culture, and claimed it as their own, and drastically tainted the blood of the human species with evil. And that all the world's problems come from this. And that the cure or solution to this mess, is to reestablish the pure blooded ruling class that is not infected by the sinister Neanderthal genes...So, would this concept have anything to do with Kealey's enochian genetic archive under his farm and the reason why he claims to check people's DNA at his door?

    Well...taking the main theme of Bradley's work, I must acknowledge the similarities it has with Nazi mythology...cause remember now, according to Bradley, the people with the most concentration of Neanderthal DNA are Jews. Here's an excerpt from an interview done with the author Peter Levenda

    As for the Jewish elements of Freemasonry, as with the Germans and Templarism whatever was Jewish was conveniently ignored or explained away as elements that were appropriated by the Jews from older, more authentic, sources. The Nazis that I met during the course of the last 20 odd years have never agreed that the Jews were the repository of any special knowledge or ability, only that they had stolen the family jewels, so to speak - which was the core of the Jewish conspiracy - and that the jewels had to be reclaimed and the Jews destroyed once and for all.
    [...]
    The "volkish" pagan mystic Guido von List and the ex-Cistercian monk Lanz von Leibenfels promoted esoteric metaphysical theories concerning the secret history of the Aryan/Germanic race and the corrupting nature of Christianity and Judaism. The "volkish" paganism they expounded rejected Christianity, the Jews, democracy and modernism. They romanticized the German peasantry and traditional, irrational, cultic beliefs and rituals, and placed an emphasis on the organic unity of the race, (the "Volk,") and nation. The mythical Holy Grail was viewed as an Aryan symbol, not the container of Christs blood, but instead a metaphor for the racially pure blood of the German race.


    ***edit***
    And to add to this, Bradley says that he knows of one person who is a pure-blooded grail vessel...his wife (of course, he's married to one, right Rolling Eyes). And he has her on the cover of his latest holy grail book.

    Swords at Sunset: Last Stand of North America's Grail Knights (Manor House Publishing, Ancaster, Ontario 2005)

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    Now, here's were this gets funny. Remember when Kealey made that insane story of how he was given some message that he'd find his mission in life when he found a woman with the perfect pair of magic breasts? Well, it's clear where he got that idea from...Bradley explains his cover and the magical power of tits in this direct link PDF here link
    Similar to this Kealey concept here on [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] and throughout much of his talks.

    I'd also like to make the point that perhaps the most interesting relation to Michael Bradley's work is not even Glen Kealey! IMO, Michael Tsarion plagiarized Bradley's work even more than Kealey did. And I exposed Tsarion's nazi-esque inclinations in 2007 before getting into any of Watt's work. To understand Tsarion's relation to this, all you have to do is replace "Extra Terrestrial genetic manipulators" with "Neanderthal" and the entire script falls into place. It explains everything from his idea of the "origins of evil", to the anti-jewish sentiment, to the West to East migration of civilization, etc...(perhaps I'll post about this more later). I emailed Bradley and ask if he knew who Tsarion was, and he said he didn't know him. He could've been lying, but perhaps he was honest and did not know him; but I'm pretty certain that Tsarion has also plagiarized Bradley's work, and if not, they probably found a common source from these ideas from Theosophy and perhaps other modern Masonic organizations...but Theosophy, no doubt. They're just not openly saying it, but it's rather evident when you trace the source of these memetical ideas.

    I hope anyone who has read along this far, has realized by now that Kealey is not getting this information from any mysterious code or from any unspecific encyclopedias. Let's face it, who has the time to take 20 years to figure out an unstructured code? and who has the time to read all the encyclopedias before 1914? NOBODY DOES!!! You couldn't do that in a life time, so forget it if there really is a 2011 end date. Ultimate, you're not gonna find anything of substance in the sources Kealey suggests...but you can find out Kealey's ideas in fringe anthropology that revolves around Neanderthals.


    more of Kealey's sources:
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


    Last edited by Lucid Memes on Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:01 am; edited 9 times in total


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    link

    Extant
    Brown Belt
    Brown Belt

    Number of posts: 555
    Registration date: 2009-04-04
    Location: The Forge

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Extant on Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:54 pm

    Interesting. I've had a quick squizz of this and shall read it all a bit later. I noticed that Kealey was identified as "anti-semitic" early on in his launch as a conspiracy researcher. He moved from blaming the Jews to this troglodyte hypothesis it seems. The same as David Icke moved from the Jews to Reptilians very early on.
    Eric Hufschmid is one that doesn't even bother moving on but includes both:

    Stop Blaming Jews




    .

    Lucid Memes
    Red Belt
    Red Belt

    Number of posts: 1111
    Registration date: 2009-02-12
    Location: Here Be Dragons

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Lucid Memes on Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:42 am

    HAHA!! halfway through that page I started to lmao

    wait a minute, I think I figured out a new one

    Eric Hufschmid really reminds me of something...

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] ------------------------------- [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    affraid affraid affraid


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    link

    Extant
    Brown Belt
    Brown Belt

    Number of posts: 555
    Registration date: 2009-04-04
    Location: The Forge

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Extant on Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 am

    Yes. The entire page is ROFL!!! Laughing But it's actually quite scary coz he takes this seriously.
    And I do think there is a solid link between those conspiracy researchers who used to direct their focus on the Jews who then move onto wild and outlandish hypotheses. I noticed that Michael Bradley links in the Jews, via the Khazars, to his neanderthal hypothesis. There's something in this approach and I smell something fishy.
    Veiled, camouflaged bigotry by another name perhaps? I noted this a while back after looking into Kealey's conspiracy history, Icke's, and how Hufschmid, being a moron presumably, just chucks the whiole messy lot in together.

    Lucid Memes
    Red Belt
    Red Belt

    Number of posts: 1111
    Registration date: 2009-02-12
    Location: Here Be Dragons

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Lucid Memes on Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:19 am

    I updated my 3rd post btw.

    I think I have a feeling as to what's going on here, but I don't exactly have any certain proof, but you can tell by the commonality of the themes. The question is regards how these guys are connected...either directly or indirectly. They'd probably deny association, but I suspect they (Bradley, Kealey, Tsarion) are all Theosophists. But I'm not so sure about Eric Hufschmid...he seems like a John Birch Society type of person...and so does Kealey actually. So really, it difficult to say if they're exactly part of these group, but it's not difficult to see how their ideas are similar.


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    link

    Extant
    Brown Belt
    Brown Belt

    Number of posts: 555
    Registration date: 2009-04-04
    Location: The Forge

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Extant on Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:31 am

    Maybe, maybe. I think that the connection is far more loose and unofficial, revolving around the age old lines of racial hatred and bigotry. One of the oldest and most ingrained hatreds of all: that of the Jews. Just what I think right now.

    Lucid Memes
    Red Belt
    Red Belt

    Number of posts: 1111
    Registration date: 2009-02-12
    Location: Here Be Dragons

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Lucid Memes on Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:34 am

    Aye, I see what you mean. Stigmatize one word, they'll just come up with another name for it. I'm curious as to how wide spread this concept is.

    The Kealey, Bradley, Tsarion connection is strong however, so I'm still open to this.


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    link

    Lucid Memes
    Red Belt
    Red Belt

    Number of posts: 1111
    Registration date: 2009-02-12
    Location: Here Be Dragons

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Lucid Memes on Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:57 am

    I came across a lecture about the crusade era. In it, the professor mentioned of an old folktale that described some of Western Europe's first impressions of the Mongol invaders from the East. He mention that some Christians in the West thought the Mongols were created by "demonic gnomes" (known as Gog and Magog) located somewhere underground and who are responsible for "manufacturing barbarians and releasing them onto the steppe" and of all the barbarians, the Monogols were their greatest creation. Apparently, this has been an evolving legend since the time of Alexander the Great and had found its way into Christian and Islamic lore.

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    I found this one article with some of the tales.

    There is much confusion about the names of Gog and Magog. Sometimes it is the name of a person, and sometimes it is the name of a nation. Sometimes Gog or Magog are described as brothers, and sometimes Gog is the king of the Magog.

    [...]
    In the Bible, it is unclear where this kingdom is located- the Jewish historian Josephus associates it with "Scythia" but this was often used as a generic term for many of the northern tribes. It may also refer to Tartars, Mongols, or Turks. Other versions stated that Gog and Magog were the descendants of the ten tribes of Israel, who had worshipped the golden calf, and ignored Moses.

    Another legend gives Alexander the Great the credit for walling off the Gog and Magog. During his conquests and travels he came to a region in the Caucases, the mountain range between Europe and Asia. There he found the Gog and Magog terrorizing the area. Alexander built a wall and gates in a narrow pass between two mountains to seal them out. There are different versions of what the wall was made of- brambles, iron, brass, or asiceton (a magic metal.) There are different versions of what else Alexander left there- statues of bronze trumpeters whose horns fool the Gog and Magog into thinking a huge army is on the other side, or a stone eagle that screams if they tried to escape. But some day the gates will open and the Gog and Magog will come out and destroy the world.

    The Koran and Islamic literature have a story that is very similar to the Alexander legend. It tells of a great king called Dhoo'l-Qarnayn (or Dhucarnain) who ruled much territory. In the eastern part, there was a valley between two mountains where Gog and Magog (also called Ya'jooj and Ma'jooj) came through. They were spreading corruption and terror. Dhoo'l-Qarnayn built a huge wall in the valley out of iron and copper that Gog and Magog could not climb over. But they began to dig underneath and have been doing so for hundreds of years, and when they finally get through, they will burst out, eating, drinking, and killing. This will be the end of the world.

    Pliny does not mention the Gog and Magog by name, but he tells of the Gates of the Caucuses (erroneously called the Caspian Gates.) Here, the mountains have been torn apart, and "gates have been placed, with iron covered beams, under the center of which flows a river emitting a horrible odor; and on this side of it on a rock stands the fortress called Cumania, erected for the purpose of barring the passage of the innumerable tribes." (Rackham, 1942

    Marco Polo thought that Gog and Magog were the Mongols. According to him, the native names were "Ung and Mungul"- the Gog lived in Ung, and the Tartars lived in Mungul.

    The location of Gog and Magog has moved throughout history. Some may have confused it with early reports of the Great Wall of China. Usually though, it represents an area with heathen barbarians in it that pose a threat to the good religious people on the other side.

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    This is right on the money with this Bradley and Kealey crap.

    And apparently, President Bush told Jacques Chirac that he believed that Gog and Magog were somewhere in the Middle East and that part of his interest in the launching of the Iraq war was to somehow engage these demonic gnomes (lmao, I wish I was joking). It is no surprise to me, that the first interview I heard Kealey speak in, hearing Kealey mention that the invasion into Iraq, may be the US government's "awakening" to the Neanderthal conspiracy in Asia, from which Kealey suggested that threatening the nuclear annihilation of planet Earth is the solution to our problems. Oh yeah, Gog and Magog is big apocalyptic millennialist lore. Wink No surprise


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    link

    Extant
    Brown Belt
    Brown Belt

    Number of posts: 555
    Registration date: 2009-04-04
    Location: The Forge

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Extant on Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:01 pm

    Lucid Memes wrote:
    And apparently, President Bush told Jacques Chirac that he believed that Gog and Magog were somewhere in the Middle East and that part of his interest in the launching of the Iraq war was to somehow engage these demonic gnomes (lmao, I wish I was joking). It is no surprise to me, that the first interview I heard Kealey speak in, hearing Kealey mention that the invasion into Iraq, may be the US government's "awakening" to the Neanderthal conspiracy in Asia, from which Kealey suggested that threatening the nuclear annihilation of planet Earth is the solution to our problems. Oh yeah, Gog and Magog is big apocalyptic millennialist lore. Wink No surprise

    Interesting. This "ancient evil forces from beneath the earth" motif still seems to have some serious currency within seemingly diverse worldviews. I read about Bush Jr. and his Gog & Magog crusade insanity. I could believe he said that too. Exclamation
    But the worldviews are not really that different at the core I guess, the conspiratorial worldview fuelled the Neo-Con Manichaean dialectic thrust for building up the appearance of a great evil force for the good & true of the U.S. of A. to vanquish. And the conspiratorial wordview has been part of American foreign policy for quite some time, intertwined with strong Judaeo-Christian beliefs (thus millenarianism, as you say). So it's not all that different to more fringe conspriacy theories like Kealey, Icke, Bradley, Hufschmid, Tsarion, and the rest of the paranoiac spider monkeys. afro

    RB
    Yellow Belt
    Yellow Belt

    Number of posts: 38
    Registration date: 2010-06-12
    Location: thewoods

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by RB on Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:22 pm

    Lucid Memes wrote:So, after realizing the Desdemona is probably 95% of Kealey's own imagination (I posted the reason why I believe this in the last post of this thread [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]), I decided to see if I could find other legit sources as to where Kealey got his ideas from. I remember asking Kealey at one point, what was the eureka moment as to when he figured out the Neanderthals were behind it all...and he didn't give me an exact, clear answer. He went on a long convoluted talked about hair and DNA and was not specific at all. Instead he says he gets this type of information from his own linguistic and genetic code...which is conveniently unattainable to anyone except Kealey himself. So, in my attempt to find out his sources (if any), I did various searches on the subject of Neanderthals and I found very interesting things.

    ...




    Very nice post! Good work and thanks for sharing the results of your research.:-) Soooo... next question is where did Bradley get his ideas, and then before that, and so on? Cheers RDBois

    Lucid Memes
    Red Belt
    Red Belt

    Number of posts: 1111
    Registration date: 2009-02-12
    Location: Here Be Dragons

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by Lucid Memes on Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 pm

    RDBois wrote:Very nice post! Good work and thanks for sharing the results of your research.:-) Soooo... next question is where did Bradley get his ideas, and then before that, and so on? Cheers RDBois

    Thank you.

    And as far as where it came from, I think a good likelihood is evidenced in my last post (prior to this one of course) about the Mongols and inner earth barbarian creating gnomes blocked behind the Gates of Alexander.

    You'll see that the legend/myth of the "evil" apocalyptic "Red Jew" is related to it.
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    So it seems to me that medieval anti-Jewish memes and primitive-phobia memes have fused together into this mutant hybrid of sorts, later picked up by people like Bradley and Kealey, etc...


    _________________
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    link

    sovereignID
    White Belt
    White Belt

    Number of posts: 3
    Registration date: 2010-07-14
    Age: 62
    Location: Princeton, Indiana

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by sovereignID on Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:01 pm

    I just joined today after reading Lucid Memes excellent posts on Glen Kealey and Alan Watt. Listened to Alan Watt for years got frustrated with his reading newspapers and website to me. I can read. I then found out about Kealey. What a tale. Went thru David Icke as well. If everything is illusion but love why is David Icke worried about vaccines? Only love is real, right! nice BS.

    Thanks for the research Lucid Memes. A breath of fresh air.

    RB
    Yellow Belt
    Yellow Belt

    Number of posts: 38
    Registration date: 2010-06-12
    Location: thewoods

    Re: Kealey's Sources: Stan Gooch & Michael Bradley

    Post by RB on Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:25 pm

    sovereignID wrote:I just joined today after reading Lucid Memes excellent posts on Glen Kealey and Alan Watt. Listened to Alan Watt for years got frustrated with his reading newspapers and website to me. I can read. I then found out about Kealey. What a tale. Went thru David Icke as well. If everything is illusion but love why is David Icke worried about vaccines? Only love is real, right! nice BS.

    Thanks for the research Lucid Memes. A breath of fresh air.


    Welcome to the forum. I agree that this forum has some good posts and sometimes a breath of fresh air. Icke is opportunistic. He blurted out something about aliens on a show a while back, and because it created an outroar he simple decided to ride the wave. Kind of like "Ouppppssss I slipped and said something crazy, but hey look people are calling back to hear me say that silly thing again... Why not make a career and money of this mistake". I bet that by now he believes his own lies.

    Have you ever noticed how humans lie, knowing that they did, but if the lie is repeated may times, then the person forgets and the lie becomes a truth? This is why you can hear old foggies say crazy stuff and it all seems so real. It seems real because they now believe it to be real. It's easier to convince someone when you are convinced yourself. But it does not make it real.




    sovereignID
    White Belt
    White Belt

    Number of posts: 3
    Registration date: 2010-07-14
    Age: 62
    Location: Princeton, Indiana

    Thanks

    Post by sovereignID on Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:55 pm

    Thanks for the welcome RDBois. I hear what you're saying. I'm 58 and sometimes I'm not sure if something in my past happened or I just imagined it. My wife and I can disagree on how an event went or what we said. I'm always surprised when people do things claiming their creating memories when memory can be the first thing to go and/or be the most unreliable.

    I'm looking forward to reading the Invisible Academy and sharing, Smile

      Current date/time is Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:07 am